Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Yousef Khamis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Khamis analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Yousef Khamis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 45.99% of points on his second serve, while Khamis has won 52.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Khamis has won 52.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.61% and 30.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Khamis has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Khamis winning 54.76% (W/L 23/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Khamis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 30/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Khamis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Khamis winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Khamis was at the M25 Sharm ElSheikh, 03-04-2024, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Khamis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Khamis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Khamis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.72 while Khamis has played against players with an average rank of 27.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Khamis has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 41.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Khamis has converted 45.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Khamis
417
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (401-312)
Career Total W/L
53% (31-28)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Yousef Khamis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (34/72) | 61% (39/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (28/34) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (19/38) | 48% (12/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (25/64) | 35% (25/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Yousef Khamis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (19/29) | 62% (26/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (194/239) | 56% (223/178) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 57% (12/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.45 | 55.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (748/1300) | 67% (519/778) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (527/748) | 66% (341/519) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (257/552) | 53% (137/259) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (37/93) | 46% (32/70) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (452/1257) | 39% (286/738) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 57% (12/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 61% (11/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yousef Khamis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Yousef Khamis
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yousef Khamis
Player
Michal Krajci
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yousef Khamis
Player
Faris Zakaryia
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33
Total Points Won
26
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Yousef Khamis
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yousef Khamis
Player
Maksym Khlyvniuk
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Khamis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
